Monday, December 26, 2016

Trump could turn DOJ against civil rights, courts now critical battleground

Since the election of Donald Trump, many have been left worrying about what will happen if his administration actually turns his campaign promises into policy. One of the areas of most concern will be civil rights. Trump's threats to ban Muslims on the basis of religion, initiate mass deportations of Mexicans and to punish women for having abortions have ignited alarm among civil rights advocates and activists all around the country who are deciding where best to employ their resources in the resistance against Trump.

Although it is difficult to predict what the Trump administration actually plans to do, one can obtain a broad brush view of its intentions by Trump's recent choice of anti-civil rights advocate Jeff Sessions to lead the Department of Justice (DOJ) as Attorney General. It may be helpful to take a look at how past Republican presidents have taken action in rolling back civil rights. Past Republican presidents have used their power over the DOJ in order to weaken its ability to protect civil rights via strategic personnel changes and redirecting the priorities of the civil rights division within the department, according to Samuel Bagenstos, law professor and former Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ in a recent interview on The Majority Report.

A White House administration utilizing its power over the DOJ in order to serve its own ideological and political leanings is nothing new. In fact this has been going on since at least when Ronald Reagan was president, according to an article in the Los Angeles Times. President George W. Bush's administration had run into controversy in his firing of a group of attorneys from the DOJ which was largely seen as politically motivated. During the Bush years the administration ordered the DOJ to prioritize fighting voter fraud while deprioritizing other civil rights litigation efforts, despite little evidence of significant amounts of fraudulent voting occurring. This was obviously a desperate attempt to find any shred of evidence that could be useful in propping up the false GOP narrative of undocumented immigrants casting illegal votes for Democrats.

There is no indication to suggest the Trump administration will not use this same power over the DOJ in order to further its campaign promises to squash the civil rights of minorities and disenfranchised people. The administration could possibly fire all attorneys in the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ, which has been done by past administrations, and refill those positions with individuals who are more aligned with derailing civil rights expansion rather than enforcing civil rights laws. This will leave a large glaring hole in society's apparatus for resisting attacks on civil liberties, including hate crimes, voter suppression and repression of women's reproductive rights.

With Republicans controlling all three branches of the federal government, the courts will become an even more essential battleground in the fight to protect civil liberties. Luckily, besides relying on the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ, activists have already developed infrastructure which will be critical in the battle for civil rights via various organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR). Although these organizations have already been active in pursuing civil rights litigation their efforts are now central in engaging with the Trump administration's attacks on civil rights. Please consider supporting these organizations with donations, volunteering and whatever other means that are available.


Saturday, July 23, 2016

Trump: A Psychological Profile of a Narcissistic Madman Liar

The office of the President of the United States requires patience, open mindedness and the ability to make prudent and well thought out decisions. Several professionals in the field of psychology have gone on record stating that Donald Trump not only lacks these qualities but also displays personality traits which suggest he is severely psychologically unfit to be the head of the most powerful nation in the world.

Psychology professor Dan P. Adams in his article titled “The Mind of Trump,” published in The Atlantic, describes Trump as a narcissist whose psychology is mainly geared towards seeking praise and reward while being extremely closed-minded to new ideas and experiences. He also states that Trump seems to have an abnormally low amount of empathy for others. Additionally he states that Trump is mostly motivated by anger. Read the entire article HERE.

Trump is prone to making rash decisions due to his lack of prudence, according to an article titled “The Personality of Donald Trump” written by assistant professor of psychology Ryne A. Sherman, Ph.D. He also goes on to say that Trump may have serious problems handling negative feedback, which can be a huge disadvantage when having to make important unemotional decisions based upon unbiased logic. Read the entire article HERE.

Clinical psychologist and professor Dr. Bilal Ghandour in his article titled “A Psychological Analysis of Donald Trump,” published on Shrink Tank, suggests that Trump may be a habitual liar who is suffering from Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Read his entire article HERE.

Remember that the POTUS will be in charge of extreme power, including the entire U.S. Military and the codes to launching nuclear weapons. Somebody with Trump's serious psychological problems and personality disorders cannot be trusted to make these types of decisions while under pressure.






Wednesday, June 29, 2016

White supremacists infiltrate Brexit and Trump campaigns

The same white supremacist movement that supports Donald Trump and has been emboldened by Trump's campaign has also played a significant role in pushing the “yes” vote on Brexit. The Leave campaign was significantly based upon Islamophobia and nativist sentiments, similar to Trump's campaign. Even their slogans are quite similar. The Trump campaign regularly uses the slogan “America first” as a way to drum up anti-immigrant sentiment, while Britain First is the name of a pro-Brexit, anti-immigrant political party in the U.K. Also, just like with Trump's campaign, anti-immigrant messaging is attractive to neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups in Great Britain which had already been experiencing a resurgence.

Islamophobia and nativism

The Leave campaign significantly used Islamophobic and nativist sentiments in order to rally supporters to the cause. Similar to Trump supporters, the Leave activists blamed immigrants for Great Britain's problems. Former London mayor, Boris Johnson was one of the leading proponents of leaving the EU. Johnson had been regularly demonizing Islam for years leading up to the Brexit referendum. In a 2005 editorial, he blamed the religion of Islam for terrorist violence, despite millions of Muslims and numerous Muslim groups condemning the use of Islam by terrorists as an excuse to commit horrendous violence (1).

This type of rhetoric inflamed and encouraged Leave supporters, mirroring Trump supporters, to act out their racist tendencies through speech, threats and even physical and deadly violence. Baroness Warsi, who had been a supporter of the Leave campaign faced an onslaught of racist attacks on social media after changing her position on Brexit. She was specifically targeted for being Muslim (2).

White supremacists infiltrate the Leave campaign

The fact that the Leave campaign's ideology in Great Britain parallels the Trump campaign in the U.S. is more than just a coincidence. Both campaigns have been infiltrated by white supremacists and neo-Nazis who are all part of one global hate network of propagandists, militants and violent right wing extremists. Leading up to the Brexit vote, Jo Cox, a U.K. lawmaker who was a proponent of the Remain campaign was shot and killed by a man who was upset with her position on Brexit and refugees. He was apparently a supporter of the National Alliance, which is considered one of the most dangerous white supremacist groups in the U.S. (3). The accused murderer used a gun-building guide published by the U.S.-based group in order to skirt British guns laws (4).

The Leave victory will certainly further embolden white supremacists in the U.K. as well as the U.S. Immediately following the Brexit decision there was a sharp increase in racial incidences and attacks, many specifically referencing the Brexit vote (8). Trump has commented on the Brexit decision, citing it as a sign that his anti-immigrant message, cloaked in the guise of populism, may prevail in the U.S. despite the seeming odds against him. The surprise results of the Brexit referendum should serve as a message to those who oppose Trump in the U.S. to continue to vigorously denounce the Trump campaign since in today's political environment anything can happen and nothing should be taken for granted.

Sources





Monday, June 27, 2016

Trust Trump on Brexit? He has been dead wrong on economics for the last 25 years

Trump has been vocal with his opinions regarding Brexit.  Too bad his opinions are worthless, since his record shows that he has no idea when it comes to economics.

Friday, June 17, 2016

Friday, June 10, 2016

The next generation of hate: Trump creates future white supremacist leaders

A child is not born with hate, it is something which must be taught. The over-the-top drama of the current Presidential election in the United States is having a significant effect on children all across America. Not only has Trump's success in spreading his anti-immigrant and nativist message emboldened current white supremacist groups he is also creating the next generation of white supremacists, KKK members and neo-Nazis. America's children are being indoctrinated into an ideology of hate through the actions of adult Trump supporters and via the media's coverage of Trump's campaign.

Giving hate a voice

Ever since Trump announced his run for President in December 2015 there have been dramatic increases in anti-Muslim violence. During that month violence against Muslims occurred every single day. Violence against Muslims tripled during this time period with almost half of the occurrences being directed towards mosques. One-third of all violent attacks were directed at Muslims during this month. Three of the attacks were perpetrated by attackers who publicly supported Trump (1).

It seems that Trump's rhetoric has emboldened racists and white supremacists to act out their beliefs violently. Additionally, white supremacists have used the Trump campaign as a vehicle to express their ideology of hate via American politics. Former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke endorsed Trump for President. When Trump was first asked to denounce the KKK leader's endorsement, he balked. White nationalist Jared Taylor has also endorsed Trump's campaign (2). Essentially, Trump's success in taking over the GOP has given the ideologies of hate groups a voice in public spaces where these ideas were once thought of as taboo.

The children are listening

Increased social acceptance of this type of rhetoric exposes more children to ideas of racial stereotypes. Studies have long shown that children as young as three years old are aware of racial differences between people. By four years of age children examined in these studies have been shown to have the potential of “expressing strongly entrenched race-related values” (3).

Also, it does not take much exposure to racist ideologies for children to ingrain these ideas into their psyche and understanding of others. A recent study has shown that children internalize racist ideas in just a few days (4). Now, just imagine children being exposed to months upon months of sensational coverage and material of Trump and his hateful ideas on social media, radio and television.

The Trump effect and children

Expressions of racism by Trump and his supporters have been having a profound effect on children and their behavior. Teachers report witnessing increases in bullying, intimidation and harassment of students of nationalities, religion and races which have been targeted by the Trump campaign, according to a report released by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant sentiment has significantly increased, according to one-third of the teachers surveyed (5).

Pathway to radicalization

Now picture Trump actually winning the Presidency. Imagine these same children experiencing not only months of racist messaging, but four years or even eight years of Trump using the Presidential bully pulpit to spread his hate rhetoric? This would create the perfect fertile soil for radicalization of these children in their teen years. In fact, this is the usual age that white supremacist groups are able to recruit members into their movement.

Many known hate group leaders were radicalized during their teen years. Some of the more notable hate leaders who were radicalized as teenagers include, former KKK leader David Duke, former (now-reformed) neo-Nazi leader Frank Meeink, segregationist leader J.B. Stoner and now-reformed neo-Nazi James Fry (6)(7)(8)(9).

Trump is currently planting seeds for the development of the next crop of white supremacist leaders. The longer he is in power, the stronger the American white supremacist movement will become in the future. None of the other current Presidential candidates would come even close to this type of effect on America's children. 



Sources