Monday, December 26, 2016

Trump could turn DOJ against civil rights, courts now critical battleground

Since the election of Donald Trump, many have been left worrying about what will happen if his administration actually turns his campaign promises into policy. One of the areas of most concern will be civil rights. Trump's threats to ban Muslims on the basis of religion, initiate mass deportations of Mexicans and to punish women for having abortions have ignited alarm among civil rights advocates and activists all around the country who are deciding where best to employ their resources in the resistance against Trump.

Although it is difficult to predict what the Trump administration actually plans to do, one can obtain a broad brush view of its intentions by Trump's recent choice of anti-civil rights advocate Jeff Sessions to lead the Department of Justice (DOJ) as Attorney General. It may be helpful to take a look at how past Republican presidents have taken action in rolling back civil rights. Past Republican presidents have used their power over the DOJ in order to weaken its ability to protect civil rights via strategic personnel changes and redirecting the priorities of the civil rights division within the department, according to Samuel Bagenstos, law professor and former Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ in a recent interview on The Majority Report.

A White House administration utilizing its power over the DOJ in order to serve its own ideological and political leanings is nothing new. In fact this has been going on since at least when Ronald Reagan was president, according to an article in the Los Angeles Times. President George W. Bush's administration had run into controversy in his firing of a group of attorneys from the DOJ which was largely seen as politically motivated. During the Bush years the administration ordered the DOJ to prioritize fighting voter fraud while deprioritizing other civil rights litigation efforts, despite little evidence of significant amounts of fraudulent voting occurring. This was obviously a desperate attempt to find any shred of evidence that could be useful in propping up the false GOP narrative of undocumented immigrants casting illegal votes for Democrats.

There is no indication to suggest the Trump administration will not use this same power over the DOJ in order to further its campaign promises to squash the civil rights of minorities and disenfranchised people. The administration could possibly fire all attorneys in the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ, which has been done by past administrations, and refill those positions with individuals who are more aligned with derailing civil rights expansion rather than enforcing civil rights laws. This will leave a large glaring hole in society's apparatus for resisting attacks on civil liberties, including hate crimes, voter suppression and repression of women's reproductive rights.

With Republicans controlling all three branches of the federal government, the courts will become an even more essential battleground in the fight to protect civil liberties. Luckily, besides relying on the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ, activists have already developed infrastructure which will be critical in the battle for civil rights via various organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR). Although these organizations have already been active in pursuing civil rights litigation their efforts are now central in engaging with the Trump administration's attacks on civil rights. Please consider supporting these organizations with donations, volunteering and whatever other means that are available.


Saturday, July 23, 2016

Trump: A Psychological Profile of a Narcissistic Madman Liar

The office of the President of the United States requires patience, open mindedness and the ability to make prudent and well thought out decisions. Several professionals in the field of psychology have gone on record stating that Donald Trump not only lacks these qualities but also displays personality traits which suggest he is severely psychologically unfit to be the head of the most powerful nation in the world.

Psychology professor Dan P. Adams in his article titled “The Mind of Trump,” published in The Atlantic, describes Trump as a narcissist whose psychology is mainly geared towards seeking praise and reward while being extremely closed-minded to new ideas and experiences. He also states that Trump seems to have an abnormally low amount of empathy for others. Additionally he states that Trump is mostly motivated by anger. Read the entire article HERE.

Trump is prone to making rash decisions due to his lack of prudence, according to an article titled “The Personality of Donald Trump” written by assistant professor of psychology Ryne A. Sherman, Ph.D. He also goes on to say that Trump may have serious problems handling negative feedback, which can be a huge disadvantage when having to make important unemotional decisions based upon unbiased logic. Read the entire article HERE.

Clinical psychologist and professor Dr. Bilal Ghandour in his article titled “A Psychological Analysis of Donald Trump,” published on Shrink Tank, suggests that Trump may be a habitual liar who is suffering from Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Read his entire article HERE.

Remember that the POTUS will be in charge of extreme power, including the entire U.S. Military and the codes to launching nuclear weapons. Somebody with Trump's serious psychological problems and personality disorders cannot be trusted to make these types of decisions while under pressure.






Wednesday, June 29, 2016

White supremacists infiltrate Brexit and Trump campaigns

The same white supremacist movement that supports Donald Trump and has been emboldened by Trump's campaign has also played a significant role in pushing the “yes” vote on Brexit. The Leave campaign was significantly based upon Islamophobia and nativist sentiments, similar to Trump's campaign. Even their slogans are quite similar. The Trump campaign regularly uses the slogan “America first” as a way to drum up anti-immigrant sentiment, while Britain First is the name of a pro-Brexit, anti-immigrant political party in the U.K. Also, just like with Trump's campaign, anti-immigrant messaging is attractive to neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups in Great Britain which had already been experiencing a resurgence.

Islamophobia and nativism

The Leave campaign significantly used Islamophobic and nativist sentiments in order to rally supporters to the cause. Similar to Trump supporters, the Leave activists blamed immigrants for Great Britain's problems. Former London mayor, Boris Johnson was one of the leading proponents of leaving the EU. Johnson had been regularly demonizing Islam for years leading up to the Brexit referendum. In a 2005 editorial, he blamed the religion of Islam for terrorist violence, despite millions of Muslims and numerous Muslim groups condemning the use of Islam by terrorists as an excuse to commit horrendous violence (1).

This type of rhetoric inflamed and encouraged Leave supporters, mirroring Trump supporters, to act out their racist tendencies through speech, threats and even physical and deadly violence. Baroness Warsi, who had been a supporter of the Leave campaign faced an onslaught of racist attacks on social media after changing her position on Brexit. She was specifically targeted for being Muslim (2).

White supremacists infiltrate the Leave campaign

The fact that the Leave campaign's ideology in Great Britain parallels the Trump campaign in the U.S. is more than just a coincidence. Both campaigns have been infiltrated by white supremacists and neo-Nazis who are all part of one global hate network of propagandists, militants and violent right wing extremists. Leading up to the Brexit vote, Jo Cox, a U.K. lawmaker who was a proponent of the Remain campaign was shot and killed by a man who was upset with her position on Brexit and refugees. He was apparently a supporter of the National Alliance, which is considered one of the most dangerous white supremacist groups in the U.S. (3). The accused murderer used a gun-building guide published by the U.S.-based group in order to skirt British guns laws (4).

The Leave victory will certainly further embolden white supremacists in the U.K. as well as the U.S. Immediately following the Brexit decision there was a sharp increase in racial incidences and attacks, many specifically referencing the Brexit vote (8). Trump has commented on the Brexit decision, citing it as a sign that his anti-immigrant message, cloaked in the guise of populism, may prevail in the U.S. despite the seeming odds against him. The surprise results of the Brexit referendum should serve as a message to those who oppose Trump in the U.S. to continue to vigorously denounce the Trump campaign since in today's political environment anything can happen and nothing should be taken for granted.

Sources





Monday, June 27, 2016

Trust Trump on Brexit? He has been dead wrong on economics for the last 25 years

Trump has been vocal with his opinions regarding Brexit.  Too bad his opinions are worthless, since his record shows that he has no idea when it comes to economics.

Friday, June 17, 2016

Friday, June 10, 2016

The next generation of hate: Trump creates future white supremacist leaders

A child is not born with hate, it is something which must be taught. The over-the-top drama of the current Presidential election in the United States is having a significant effect on children all across America. Not only has Trump's success in spreading his anti-immigrant and nativist message emboldened current white supremacist groups he is also creating the next generation of white supremacists, KKK members and neo-Nazis. America's children are being indoctrinated into an ideology of hate through the actions of adult Trump supporters and via the media's coverage of Trump's campaign.

Giving hate a voice

Ever since Trump announced his run for President in December 2015 there have been dramatic increases in anti-Muslim violence. During that month violence against Muslims occurred every single day. Violence against Muslims tripled during this time period with almost half of the occurrences being directed towards mosques. One-third of all violent attacks were directed at Muslims during this month. Three of the attacks were perpetrated by attackers who publicly supported Trump (1).

It seems that Trump's rhetoric has emboldened racists and white supremacists to act out their beliefs violently. Additionally, white supremacists have used the Trump campaign as a vehicle to express their ideology of hate via American politics. Former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke endorsed Trump for President. When Trump was first asked to denounce the KKK leader's endorsement, he balked. White nationalist Jared Taylor has also endorsed Trump's campaign (2). Essentially, Trump's success in taking over the GOP has given the ideologies of hate groups a voice in public spaces where these ideas were once thought of as taboo.

The children are listening

Increased social acceptance of this type of rhetoric exposes more children to ideas of racial stereotypes. Studies have long shown that children as young as three years old are aware of racial differences between people. By four years of age children examined in these studies have been shown to have the potential of “expressing strongly entrenched race-related values” (3).

Also, it does not take much exposure to racist ideologies for children to ingrain these ideas into their psyche and understanding of others. A recent study has shown that children internalize racist ideas in just a few days (4). Now, just imagine children being exposed to months upon months of sensational coverage and material of Trump and his hateful ideas on social media, radio and television.

The Trump effect and children

Expressions of racism by Trump and his supporters have been having a profound effect on children and their behavior. Teachers report witnessing increases in bullying, intimidation and harassment of students of nationalities, religion and races which have been targeted by the Trump campaign, according to a report released by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant sentiment has significantly increased, according to one-third of the teachers surveyed (5).

Pathway to radicalization

Now picture Trump actually winning the Presidency. Imagine these same children experiencing not only months of racist messaging, but four years or even eight years of Trump using the Presidential bully pulpit to spread his hate rhetoric? This would create the perfect fertile soil for radicalization of these children in their teen years. In fact, this is the usual age that white supremacist groups are able to recruit members into their movement.

Many known hate group leaders were radicalized during their teen years. Some of the more notable hate leaders who were radicalized as teenagers include, former KKK leader David Duke, former (now-reformed) neo-Nazi leader Frank Meeink, segregationist leader J.B. Stoner and now-reformed neo-Nazi James Fry (6)(7)(8)(9).

Trump is currently planting seeds for the development of the next crop of white supremacist leaders. The longer he is in power, the stronger the American white supremacist movement will become in the future. None of the other current Presidential candidates would come even close to this type of effect on America's children. 



Sources

Monday, May 30, 2016

Trump's Energy Proposals Reveals Incompetence and Ignorance of Economics

One of the most pressing issues for voters in the United States is the economy. It is important for the future President to have a strong grasp on the various factors affecting the U.S economy. However, Donald Trump's vague proposals regarding the U.S. energy industry show just how inept he really is when it comes to economics.

Coal vs. Natural Gas

Trump claims he wants to take measures to increase coal production in the U.S. in order to rejuvenate the ailing coal industry. However, he also proposes to boost the natural gas industry at the same time in order to create more jobs within that sector. This is all well and good, except the fact that it flies in the face of any contemporary understanding of how energy markets actually work.

Inverse Correlation

Demand in the coal and natural gas markets is inversely correlated. This means that when demand for natural gas goes up, demand for coal goes down. Natural gas and coal act as replacements for one another in the energy markets. Most of this has been caused by dramatic decreases in the price of natural gas due to more efficient natural gas-fired combined-cycle technology. Cheap prices for natural gas make it a more practical choice for many energy producers to meet demand as opposed to using coal. (2)

Fracking

Fracking causes an increase in natural gas consumption by causing dramatic increases in supply of natural gas. Any increase in production of natural gas, as Trump is proposing to do, will result in increasingly lower natural gas prices making coal comparatively even more expensive. More energy producers will start switching from coal to natural gas, further draining the coal industry of jobs. Therefore, it is impossible for Trump to actually be able to do what he proposes, which is to increase both production of natural gas and coal at the same time. (3)

Economists Find Trump's Energy Proposals Implausible and Ignorant

Most economists quickly discredited Trump's proposals for the energy industry. “He [Trump] can't have it both ways – talk up expanding natural gas supply when in North Dakota, and talk about bringing coal mining jobs when in Kentucky!” said Robert N. Stavins, director of the environmental economics program at Harvard. In other words, it is not possible to promise more jobs in the natural gas sector while simultaneously strengthening the coal industry. (1)

Clearly, Trump is either ignorant of how global and energy markets work or he is purposely misleading his followers, opting to consider politics over economics when proposing economic policies. Whichever it is, this shows he is obviously unfit to manage the world's largest economy. Allowing him to do so could bring about extraordinary disaster to the U.S. economy as well as the rest of the world.

Sources



Saturday, May 28, 2016

The Rise of Trump: From the KKK to the Tea Party


Many in America may be stunned by the sudden rise of a presidential candidate who seems to be purposely pandering to the followers of known white supremacists, such as David Duke. Most political pundits would have considered that political suicide for any contemporary presidential candidate prior to Donald Trump's candidacy. However, Trump's rise is no fluke and had been in the works for about seven years.

Ever since the election of the first Black American President, the right planted the seeds which allowed white supremacists, the KKK and neo-Nazis to gain a significantly stronger voice and influence in American politics. It was the response of right-wing GOP politicians to Obama being elected President which opened the door for white supremacist groups to infiltrate the Republican party, ultimately allowing Trump to appeal to their racist and nativist ideologies in order to win the 2016 GOP nomination.

The Tea Party and Obama

The far right-wing of the GOP, known as the Tea Party, was born in opposition to Obama, the first Black American President. The birth of the Tea Party movement can be traced to one specific moment. One morning in mid-February 2009, Rick Santelli, a former commodities trader and Vice President at Drexel Burnham Lambert was angry over the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan. This Obama Administration proposal would reduce the monthly mortgage payments of 9 million U.S. homeowners who were facing foreclosure at the time. (1)

This prompted Santelli, who had been encouraged by CNBC anchors, to deliver a speech on the floor of the Chicago Board of Trade. In the speech he accused the government of “promoting bad behavior.” A CNBC anchor likened Santelli to “a revolutionary leader” who was rising up against the oppressive Obama government. Santelli responded by suggesting holding a “Chicago Tea Party” by “dumping in [to Lake Michigan] some derivative securities.” Through this anti-government rant against the Obama Administration, the Tea Party movement was born. (1)

The Tea Party and the Ku Klux Klan

Along with Santelli's anti-government sentiment and anger towards Obama, the resulting Tea Party Movement began incorporating other values into its platform. These values also happened to align with another previous far right-wing movement: the Ku Klux Klan.

The KKK and other white supremacist groups had always espoused inflammatory anti-government sentiments along with their racist ideologies. This could be seen when a Mississippi attorney with ties to the KKK, Carl Ford, made headlines in 2014 after donating to the campaign of Tea Party Republican Chris McDaniel. Ford considered himself “pro-confederacy and anti-Lincoln” while McDaniel had been known to appear at neo-Confederacy conferences. Ford expressed anti-establishment and anti-government sentiment when explaining his support of Tea Party candidates. (4)

Reformed neo-Nazi leader Frank Meeink described in an interview with David Pakman in 2014 about the significant role anti-government sentiment played within the white supremacist movements. In this same interview Meeink described how white supremacist groups were openly encouraging their followers to join the Tea Party movement for the purpose of influencing the ideological slant of the burgeoning right-wing phenomenon. Clearly, the ideas of anti-establishment and anti-government sentiment had begun to blend into each other within the far right-wing movement. (6)

Christianity's Role in the Tea Party and KKK

On the other hand, anti-government and anti-establishment sentiments are not the only ideological parallels between the Tea Party and the KKK. The contemporary Tea Party platform also promotes the idea of America being a “Christian nation” which mirrors the KKK's assertion that “our Nation have no future unless we unite and organize White Christian Patriots.” Forty-seven percent of American Tea Party members also identify themselves with the religious right, according to a recent survey conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute. Also,75 percent of Americans identifying with the Tea Party movement also call themselves Christian conservatives. (2)(3)(7)

These factors provided the KKK and other white supremacist groups the ideologically fertile ground to plant their seeds and begin their take over of the GOP via the Tea Party. The fruit of these seeds would eventually lead to the rise of Trump. It was not that the white supremacist groups had specifically chosen Trump. They were simply waiting for a candidate who would not be afraid to espouse their racist ideologies via fear-mongering around immigration and their ideas of a “Christian nation” via Islamophobia. Although the Trump campaign may now be looking to soften its rhetoric in preparation of the general election, now that it has clinched the GOP nomination, one should not fall for the media's attempt to sanitize the Trump campaign. At its ideological core and beginnings, the Trump campaign is simply a political puppet of the KKK, white supremacists and neo-Nazis.



Sources

Thursday, May 19, 2016